hard questions

This commit is contained in:
2025-04-28 23:19:49 +01:00
parent 49c37548c0
commit 5032273796
3 changed files with 400 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
title: Median of Two Sorted Arrays
slug: median-of-two-sorted-arrays
difficulty: hard
leetcode_id: 4
leetcode_url: https://leetcode.com/problems/median-of-two-sorted-arrays/
categories:
- arrays
- binary-search
patterns:
- binary-search
description: |
Given two sorted arrays `nums1` and `nums2` of size m and n respectively, return the median
of the two sorted arrays.
The overall run time complexity should be O(log(m+n)).
constraints: |
- nums1.length == m
- nums2.length == n
- 0 <= m <= 1000
- 0 <= n <= 1000
- 1 <= m + n <= 2000
- -10^6 <= nums1[i], nums2[i] <= 10^6
examples:
- input: "nums1 = [1,3], nums2 = [2]"
output: "2.0"
explanation: "Merged array is [1,2,3]. Median is 2."
- input: "nums1 = [1,2], nums2 = [3,4]"
output: "2.5"
explanation: "Merged array is [1,2,3,4]. Median is (2+3)/2 = 2.5."
explanation:
approach: |
1. Binary search on the smaller array for partition point
2. Partition both arrays such that left half has (m+n+1)//2 elements
3. Check if partition is valid: max(left) <= min(right)
4. If valid, compute median from boundary elements
5. Adjust binary search bounds based on comparison
intuition: |
The median divides the combined array into two halves of equal size. We don't need to
actually merge; we just need to find the correct partition.
If we choose i elements from nums1 for the left half, we need (m+n+1)//2 - i from nums2.
Binary search on i (0 to m) to find where nums1[i-1] <= nums2[j] and nums2[j-1] <= nums1[i].
This is O(log min(m,n)) since we binary search on the smaller array.
common_pitfalls:
- title: Not handling edge cases at partition
description: |
When partition is at array boundary (i=0 or i=m), use -inf or inf for boundary values.
wrong_approach: "Accessing nums1[i-1] when i=0"
correct_approach: "Use float('-inf') if i == 0"
- title: Binary searching on the longer array
description: |
Always binary search on the shorter array to ensure valid partition exists
and for better efficiency.
- title: Odd vs even total length
description: |
For odd total, median is max of left half.
For even, it's average of max(left) and min(right).
key_takeaways:
- Binary search on partition, not on values
- Partition both arrays to have equal halves
- Handle boundary conditions with infinity
- O(log min(m,n)) is achievable
time_complexity: "O(log min(m,n))"
space_complexity: "O(1)"
complexity_explanation: |
Time: Binary search on the smaller array.
Space: Only constant extra variables.
solutions:
- approach_name: Binary Search on Partition (Optimal)
is_optimal: true
code: |
def find_median_sorted_arrays(nums1: list[int], nums2: list[int]) -> float:
# Ensure nums1 is the smaller array
if len(nums1) > len(nums2):
nums1, nums2 = nums2, nums1
m, n = len(nums1), len(nums2)
left, right = 0, m
half_len = (m + n + 1) // 2
while left <= right:
i = (left + right) // 2 # Partition in nums1
j = half_len - i # Partition in nums2
# Handle edge cases with infinity
nums1_left = float('-inf') if i == 0 else nums1[i - 1]
nums1_right = float('inf') if i == m else nums1[i]
nums2_left = float('-inf') if j == 0 else nums2[j - 1]
nums2_right = float('inf') if j == n else nums2[j]
if nums1_left <= nums2_right and nums2_left <= nums1_right:
# Found valid partition
if (m + n) % 2 == 1:
return max(nums1_left, nums2_left)
else:
return (max(nums1_left, nums2_left) +
min(nums1_right, nums2_right)) / 2
elif nums1_left > nums2_right:
# Too many elements from nums1 in left half
right = i - 1
else:
# Too few elements from nums1 in left half
left = i + 1
return 0.0 # Should never reach here
explanation: |
Binary search to find correct partition point in the smaller array.
Partition is valid when all left elements <= all right elements.
Compute median from the four boundary elements.